The
views and opinions expressed on this page are solely those of Casey Lartigue,
Jr., and not Black Men in America.com or any other
organization he is associated with. Where appropriate, we strongly
recommend that additional professional advice be sought before acting upon
the information contained herein.
Casey J. Lartigue, Jr.
If you would like to respond to any of Casey's articles
click
here and sign our
Guestbook
to leave a public or private statement, comment or reaction. You can
also send your comments to the
Webmaster
who will forward your e-mail directly to Casey.
Here are some of our
favorite pieces of work from Casey J. Lartigue, Jr.
The GOP's Next (Black) Idea? By Casey
Lartigue, Jr. | TheRoot.com
Casey Lartigue, Jr., has a
thought-provoking article on
The Root.com. Take a read and give Casey some feedback. You can
learn more about Casey at "Casey's Corner" at Black Men In America.com.
G.J.
Trading slavery reparations for affirmative action.
Getty Images
March
3, 2008--Concerned that Republicans haven't tried hard enough
to reach out to black voters, Bruce Bartlett, a former advisor to
President Ronald Reagan and treasury official under President George H.
W. Bush, suggests a shocker: Republicans should come out in favor of
reparations for slavery.
Republicans for reparations? Bartlett
makes the suggestion in
Wrong on Race, an expose on the "hidden" racist history of the
Democratic Party. Bartlett skewers former Democratic presidents such as
Franklin Delano Roosevelt and Woodrow Wilson for bigotry and cowardice
on the issue of race and assails a number of Democratic senators,
representatives and governors for their do-or-die defense of slavery and
Jim Crow.
Skipping ahead to today, Bartlett writes
that black voters are taken for granted by Democrats and have been
written off by Republicans. He argues that blacks would benefit from
having the two parties compete for their votes.
In Saturday's Washington Post,
columnist Colbert I. King was axin' the question: "What Would Dr. King
Think?"
After hearing this question
over a number of years, from people on the left, right, center, fringe,
etc., it seems that the answer is: MLK typically seems to think whatever it is that
the questioner thinks.
Really, how often do people who aren't attacking MLK ask, "What would
King think," and then answer, and then say, "And MLK would be WRONG!"
A few years ago I was asked by
a TV producer to speculate what Dr. King would say today about various
issues. I think that I gave the answer above, or something similar. I
never got called back to be on the show.
A few months later I wrote a
piece
about what we can learn from MLK. I tried to avoid directly dealing with
the question, What would King think.
Instead of presuming that we would know what the guy thought 40 years
later, I thought a better starting point would be: what can I learn from
him and how could I apply it?
Because he was so thoughtful,
it is difficult to predict how he might have thought 4 decades later.
MLK could have been like Frederick Douglass, who remained remarkably
consistent over several decades of activism. He could have turned out
like intellectual W.E.B. Dubois, who got so fed up at the end of his
life that he renounced his U.S. citizenship and became a naturalized
citizen of Ghana (where he died at the age of 95, one day before MLK's
I Have a Dream
speech). MLK could have turned out like Marion Barry--we could be
downloading copies of the MLK-Paris Hilton sex tapes. Or he could have
turned out like the late John Wilson,
a leftist D.C. activist who at the end of his life came to support
charter schools.
Anyway, Colbert King did try to
answer the question, What Would Dr. King think?
But let's turn that question around and ask--What
Would Colbert King think? I mean, could Colbert King's most
faithful readers predict in advance what he would say in a column on a
topic? Could they predict what he said in a column 10 or 20 years ago?
That mind-reading stuff does appear to be a little difficult.
A radio host I occasionally sub
for asked the question--what if MLK had run for office? He isn't sure
that King would have been a shoo-in. I agree. As much as Rosa Parks was
loved, she lost an election within the NAACP within the early 1980s. I
believe that she was running for VP.
CJL
Monday, January 16,
2006
What's your
error type (assuming that you make errors)?
Economist Walter E. Williams
often notes that there are two types of errors that someone making a
decision could make: Type 1 (being overly cautious) Type II (not being
cautious enough).
For example: "Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) officials, in their drug approval process, can
essentially make two errors. They can approve a drug that has
unanticipated dangerous side effects (type II). Or, they can disapprove,
or hold up approval of, a drug that's perfectly safe and effective (type
I). In other words, they can err on the side of under-caution or err on
the side of over-caution. Which error do FDA officials have the greater
incentive to make?"
I was thinking about that as I
read
Radley Balko's post on his hometown Indianapolis Colts getting
bounced from the playoffs again. The Colts had so much success during
the latest regular season that they clinched home-field advantage with
three or four weeks to go. Should they try to go undefeated or rest
their players? The San Diego Chargers helped them with that the
following week, defeating them and ruining their chance for a perfect
season.
With the perfect season no
longer possible, the big question became: Rest or rust? Dungy went for
rest. Radley says it was rust that doomed them yesterday in their loss
to the Steelers. Either way, Dungy would have gotten criticized if his
team lost. Go with a type I error and be overly cautious, and people
note that the Colts hadn't played a competitive game in a month. Go with
a Type II error, and have Marvin Harrison tear up a knee in a
"meaningless" game, people would be saying that Dungy had not only
wrecked the team's chances this year, but also next year.
Right now, the superintendent
of DC public schools is actually risking making a type II error--he has
notified 1,100 DC public school teachers that they'll be out of work if
they don't acquire their
credentials by June 30. Right now the
editorial page is praising the threat, although we'll see if in June
and July they'll be as steadfast once the metro section starts profiling
teachers thrown out of work.
More than anything, this might
be a message from superintendent Janey that a new sheriff is in town.
Other superintendents have probably made similar threats and not
followed through (which is why almost 25 percent of the teaching force
lacks the credentials).
Now, what the Post needs to do
is to examine what it means to be a certified teacher in D.C. What's on
the exam? How rigorous is it? What are some of the commonly missed
questions that are no longer used? I recall reading that the test given
to D.C. teachers up to the late 1960s or mid-1970s was thrown out
because too many black teachers were failing it. I would imagine that
the test has only gotten easier since then.
CJL
Fighting and Talking 'Til
He Dies
Mike
Tyson, 38, is saying that he will retire from boxing. I'm betting a
friend $500 that Tyson will be scheduled to fight in a boxing ring at
least once by his 45th birthday. I figure that when I win the money that
I'll be able to use it to fly round-trip and take a taxi to the hotel
I'll stay in for the night.
One
request for Tyson--could you shut up and do whatever it is that you are
going to do next? Tyson is now talking about becoming a missionary in
Africa. Football player Ricky Williams quit on the NFL two years ago,
and is now thinking about coming back. He may be a chump, too, but at
least he didn't talk endlessly to reporters about what he was going to
do--he just did it! And he didn't even give two weeks notice.
CJL -
Posted June 14, 2005
Cosmic Justice in the
Classroom
I'm
trying to get the NBA commissioner on the phone to tell him about my
idea--give extra points for players depending upon their height. Players
who are less than 6 feet tall should be awarded four points for each
basket, players between 6 and 7 feet should get three points for each
basket, and players above 7 feet tall should get two points for each
basket.
Sounds
crazy, I know, but that is the type of thinking behind educators who
want to award students points for their effort or other factors
unrelated to the key questions--have you mastered the material or
answered the questions correctly? In today's Washington Post,
there's an article about teachers who disagree on whether or not
students should be given extra points for effort.
As a
former teacher, I will admit that there were times that I felt
sympathetic about students who were struggling, but apparently were
studying hard. (I say "apparently" because some people know how to put
on a good show; some students may only try hard when they are in class;
and some people who try hard don't brag about it.) But I resisted the
temptation to award extra points because it would have cheated the
students who HAD mastered the material.
It would
seem crazy for a sports team to award players who tried hard, but
ultimately, can't put the ball in the hoop. Just as there are some
students who might not have to study as hard as others, there are also
some players who play the game naturally.
Grades
aren't evil--they are there to give us signals about our performance.
Unfortunately, to far too many educators, it makes perfect sense to toss
a few extra points to a struggling student. It is yet another example of
people wanting to play God on a daily basis, believing that they are
smart enough, as Adam Smith wrote, to move people around as if they were
pieces on a chess board.
CJL -
Posted June
14, 2005
Some things that ought
not be done, ought not be done well
Yes, I'm
smart enough to wear a seat belt when I'm driving. I won't drive until
my wife has put on her seat belt. And I remind all of my passengers that
I often slam on the brakes.
Walter E.
Williams was on the Rush Limbaugh Show on Friday talking about police in
Maryland using night-vision goggles to catch people who aren't wearing
their seat belts at night.
There is
a saying that when the government does stuff it shouldn't be doing, then
it probably isn't doing stuff that it should be doing.Truly, there must be some other crimes going on in which people clearly
are being victimized and are more worthy of being targeted by law
enforcement resources.
Ah, but wearing a seat belt
supposedly doesn't just impact you. The seat belt prevents you from
using your body as a weapon as it is tossed from your vehicle when you
rammed into an 18-wheeler.
A problem
with government being an organization of busybodies is that modern
technology is helping it become more efficient at bothering the rest of
us.
Posted June
14, 2005
Black People versus Niggers
Chris Rock got it right--there's a civil war going on. On one side,
we've got black people. On the other side--Niggers. Niggers have got to
go!
Black hoodlums punish black people who are law-abiding citizens every
day. Not only are the hoodlums more likely to kill other black people,
but they also impose a cost in interactions black people have with other
people, including other black people.
Yesterday I took a cab to a breakfast meeting. As usual, I handed my
money to the cab driver early. I hate it when people wait until they
reach their destination before they remember they've got to pay
for the ride. I mean it isn't a surprise that the cab driver will be
expecting some money. Then the riders waste time fumbling through their
purses, either holding up traffic or the next person waiting to use the
cab. I remember watching other cabs pass by while waiting for one woman
to find her money. It reminds me of being at the supermarket when a
shopper will wait until everything has been bagged before remembering,
"Well, I guess I should search through my entire purse now so I can
write a check for $147.12."
A second reason I pay early: I don't want to forget to ask for a receipt
so I can get reimbursed.
Yesterday the cabbie thanked me when I paid, then I complained about
those shoppers who hold up the lines. He agreed. He said that Friday and
Saturday nights are his toughest, because he has to deal with drunken
people getting into his cab. Then during the conversation he began to
complain about blacks who hop out of his cab without paying. Of course
it isn't just blacks who do that, but he answered that probably 99
percent of his customers who have hopped out without paying have been
black people. The white people who haven't paid have been so drunk that
by the time he got them to their destination, that he just rolled them
out of the cab or had to get someone at the destination to come out and
get the person and pay. But he was still really angry about the blacks
who hop out of his cab without paying. The cabbie said, "I'm black. I
know people won't like it when I say this. I get ripped off, what am I
supposed to do? People who say I have to pick up everybody don't care
about my safety and they don't care that I keep getting ripped off. The
worst thing is that some of them, when I'm ready to drop them off, will
just look at me and say, 'I don't have any money.'"
Yes, Niggers have got to go!
I warned the cabbie that he might not want to repeat his remarks to
other people--there are too many lawyers in town, he might pick up some
fool from the ACLU and get hit with a lawsuit.
What bothers me is that cab drivers profile black men who wouldn’t think
about hopping out of a cab or robbing a cabbie. This means that black
men who are not professionally dressed are even more likely to get
discriminated against. We all must pay the price in general for the
hoodlums who live among us. Security guards, home security alarm
systems, metal bars on our homes or businesses, guns, higher insurance
premiums become even more necessary because we've got fools in this
society who don't respect private property or other people. I read years
ago that one of the reasons bus companies were eager to move from
accepting cash to token or cards is that people bus drivers were getting
held up, sometimes for just a few dollars.
I realize that some people get angry at the cab drivers for passing up
blacks, but I focus my attention on the robbers and cab-hoppers that
justify the feelings of those cab drivers. There are some times that
black men must go out of their way not to appear dangerous. In a 1986
essay, Brent Staples said that he whistled classical music tunes
when he was out walking so that white pedestrians wouldn't fear him.
Thankfully, my prediction that black rapists would start learning
classical music tunes was wrong.
Learning classical music or being professionally dressed isn't enough,
however. There are some well-dressed Niggers doing some evil things.
According to today's Washington Post: "In varying ways, hotels
throughout the region are tightening security and posting information --
in numerous languages -- about the well-dressed black man in his
twenties or thirties who police believe raped four employees while they
were cleaning rooms at hotels in the District and its suburbs over the
past four weeks."
In fact, the Post mentions three times in the today's article
that the accused rapist is well dressed. Until the rapist is caught, any
well-dressed black man at a hotel who vaguely fits the description of
the alleged rapist will be seen as a suspect. Even a Brooks Brother suit
can't protect a black man from being perceived as a rapist! I'm not
saying, by the way, that this is the first time there has ever been a
well-dressed rapist. But I live in the Washington D.C. area and the fool
is supplying bullets to people who want to portray all black men as
potential rapists. I don't have any love for the rapists and thugs who
make the media images believable. Again, to quote Chris Rock--I don't
have three guns in my house because of the media.
Of course by saying this, some people are going to think I'm singling
myself out as being a victim, that I'm saying I'm better than other
black people, that I'm ashamed to be black, or some other nonsense.
Nope. As a friend of mine has said: I'm not ashamed to be black. If
anything, I'm ashamed that there are some niggers who are seen as being
black.
So here's another case that doesn't involve me, and is on-going—Radio
Talk show host
Joe Madison recently moved into southeast D.C. From his description
of the area, it's a dangerous part of southeast, where the store owners
have Plexiglas to protect themselves from the customers. Madison is a
black professional in his 50s who has three kids who have graduated from
or are in college. In addition to his radio show, he often makes
appearances on national television shows. His wife is also a
professional, working in the airline industry. He often talks about
"giving back" to the community. He buys products from black-owned stores
whenever possible. Many people respect him.
It is becoming increasingly clear that he should have rented, not
bought, his southeast home. Based on what he has said, he is fighting a
civil war in southeast--and losing.
He has complained on his radio show about the litter, the crime, and the
lack of respect for people or property. He worries about his wife or
daughters walking out alone.
Earlier this week, he was wondering why there are dead white roosters
being left on a road about a block from his house. I don't mean to
profile everyone in southeast, but based on my visits to the area, I
doubt that there are many farmers in southeast D.C. It turns out that
dead roosters being left on the side of the road signals to drug buyers
in the area that drugs are available. He says he has noticed a lot of
activity in the area after the dead roosters are left on the side of the
road. These are just the types of things that a middle-class man is
usually ignorant about or hears second-hand from others, unless he is
looking for drugs.
I suspect that Madison believed he could make a change in the community.
I won't say that he won't. But so far, he is losing the civil war. He
talked the other day about when he was young, his older relatives told
him that you can "be poor, but you don't have to be dirty." I was
reminded of a friend who says that "poor people may not choose where
they live, but they can choose how they live."
These days that might sound like blaming the victim, but just because
you are poor doesn't mean you should write on the walls, pee in front of
a grocery store, or buy a DVD player instead of a book for your child.
I remember hearing about black pride in the past in the face of racism.
For example, Walter Williams has written about black people being able
to sleep on their porches in poor areas even in the 1950s. Crime was
slightly worse in black areas, but nothing compared to crime rates in
the 1960s. Williams, who could be accurately described as conservative
or libertarian, would probably differ on a lot of issues with Madison, a
community activist with radical left leanings. (Plus, you can tell the
difference in the way the two have treated me on the radio. Williams
invited me to be a guest on the Rush Limbaugh; Madison ranted about me
one day for at least 15 minutes, and on another day, after I called in
to argue with him, he and his guests ranted about me for much of the
next hour.)
Madison, who spends much of his time on-air bashing president Bush, then
said: We can't blame white people for this. We can't blame Bush for
this. This is really our problem. I don't see how you can live in a
community that is . . . trashy. I'm not looking for excuses; I'm looking
for what's going on in people's minds. Why do black people lower their
standard of living? He noted that there are four things you can find in
any black neighborhood: 1) Black people. 2) Liquor stores. 3) Cigarette
ads. 4) Litter.
If Rush Limbaugh said such things, Madison would probably still devote
four hours to his next show about white racism (probably an oxymoron to
Madison). But Madison has the type of street credibility that he can get
away with it.
Madison has said the obvious--this is a problem black people must deal
with. Yet, other days, he treats the obvious as being taboo. Most days
he is ranting about conservatives, the media, institutional racism,
president Bush. I seriously doubt that white conservatives are sneaking
into black neighborhoods at night to write graffiti on the walls. It
isn't the media that pees or litters in front of the stores. It isn't
institutional racism hopping out of cabs. It isn't president Bush who
will buy a DVD player before buying his kids some books.
A few years ago Louis Farrakhan referred to non-black merchants working
in black areas as "bloodsuckers." But he was wrong. The real
bloodsuckers are the hoodlums in those areas. Black people shouldn't be
afraid to say that aloud, even when white people are around. A decade
ago Jesse Jackson famously said, "There is nothing more painful to me at
this stage in my life than to walk down the street and hear footsteps
and start thinking about robbery. Then look around and see someone white
and feel relieved."
Once conservatives jumped on that statement, Jesse backed down. It was
okay for him to dole out some reality when he was talking with black
people, but he wouldn't want his words to be used to justify racial
profiling. Defeating racial profiling is more important than cracking
down on crime, for some people.
The time has come for black people to declare war on the Niggers
screwing up everything.
Hot Off the Presses: The
Latest Black Urban Legends
By Casey J. Lartigue,
Jr.
Within the last few days, I've
been sent this e-mail by three or four people:
Thurgood Marshall, Roy Wilkins, Langston Hughes, Zora Neale Hurston,
Patricia Roberts Harris are all on these stamps. Please forward this and
buy a book of our stamps ASAP. The P.O. will DESTROY all remaining
African American Heritage stamps at theend of the month instead of
following their usual procedure of selling themuntil they are depleted.
Why? Because we're not buying them! However, ourpostal workers are
asking patrons to complain to the Post Master, via acomplaint form.
Please ask for and complete the form (at the post office).Skip the love,
flag, rose or teddy- bear stamps that they offer youautomatically,
Request African-American stamps every time. If we don't buythem, nobody
will. We need to keep the little things that we do get. Pleasesend this
email to all your friends so we can keep BLACK STAMPS incirculation!!!!
I get that e-mail about once a year, especially around Black
History Month. There is a pattern to these e-mails:
1) Please forward. 2) Something outrageous is being done. 3) "We" aren't doing something to stop it. 4) Buy a certain item, vote, or protest in some other way.
The Internet makes it easier to pass around bad information. The
first Urban Legend I heard was that Alfonso Ribero had broken his neck
while break-dancing.
14 BLACK COLLEGES TO CLOSE DOWN FOREVER? 1. Allen Univ.. (Columbia, SC) 2. Arkansas Baptist College (Little Rock, AK) 3. Barber-Scotia College (Concord, NC) 4. Central State Univ.. (Wilberforce, OH) 5. Houston-Tillotson College (Austin, TX) 6. Jarvis Christian College (Hawkins, TX) 7. Lane College (Jackson, TN) 8. Mary Holmes College (West Point, MS) 9. Miles College (Birmingham, AL) 10. Paul Quinn College (Dallas, TX) 11. Southwestern Christian College (Terrell, TX) 12. Texas College (Tyler, TX) 13. Texas Southern Univ.. (Houston, TX) 14. Wiley College (Marshall, TX)
Isn't it interesting that seven of these colleges are in Texas? Who
is the Governor, running for President in that state again? Who is the
one claiming to be the leader in 'Education' throughout the U.S.? Please
forward this information to all the brothers and sisters you know,
(especially those who vote!)
Of course I was suspicious because this one was being passed
around before the presidential election and was playing to people's
fears.
I picked up the phone and called either alumni affairs or
admissions at Texas Southern University in Houston, Texas. I patiently
explained to a woman why I was calling and she sighed: "I've been sent
this e-mail so many times. I don't know why people still send this
around. It must be fun to scare people."
She thanked me for calling because people will pass around the
e-mail without bothering to check it out.
Actually, any e-mails involving Bush and black people citing
something bad should be treated with suspicion.
In early 2002, some Bush-haters were having fun with another
story about Bush. At a meeting in November 2001, president Bush
supposedly asked the president of Brazil, "Do
you have blacks, too?"
The original source was a link that
is now dead reported that Condi Rice, rather dramatically, corrected the
president. That should have raised red flags, for two reasons. One,
there's no way anyone would have that type of story without Nation
magazine or Mother Jones featuring it. Two, the advisors of presidents
aren't known for correcting the president on the spot.
If the president of the United States said he had just seen
Elvis, NO ONE who works for the president would correct him on the spot
unless it had been scripted in advance. They'll let the president finish
what he was saying, then later various spokesmen would explain that the
president meant to say that he wishes he could see Elvis or that the
president had a dream about Elvis.
The Washington Post
later checked out Bush's alleged question, but seemed skeptical.
Some of my liberal discussion buddies were besides themselves
from the get-go, however. They started in with their typical
points--Bush is stooopid! Bush doesn't know anything about blacks! Bush
is an affirmative action president! Bush, a Yale graduate, doesn't know
world history! Bush is a lightweight, an opportunist! He's lazy! Bush
has never had a real job! Bush went AWOL during Vietnam! Bush stole the
election! He's not my president, I didn't vote for him, my vote was
stolen, blah, blah, blah!
I made two points at the time--one, does the presence of blacks
mean that Bush should change his policy towards Brazil? If not, it
doesn't seem to be important for him to know the racial composition of a
different country.
Two, I asked if there were any blacks of influence in Brazil who
would be present at meetings with the president of the U.S.? That would
have answered Bush's question...
Well, we have some breaking news on that. Shortly after that,
the president of Brazil appointed Rio De Janeiro prosecutor Joaquim
Benedito Barbosa Gomes as the country's first black Supreme Court
Justice.
According to a BBC
article: "Although more than half of Bazilians are descended from
Africans there are only a handful of black faces in positions of power
in Brasilia."
Some of these Urban Legends are relatively innocent.
There's also one not yet on the Urban Legends site.
It has the pattern I mentioned above. And don't forget, a white
person supposedly wrote this.
"BLACKS DON'T READ"
Please Note:
For those of you who heard it, this is the article Dee Lee was
reading this morning on a New York radio station. For those of you who
didn't hear it, this is very deep and true! BLACKS DON'T READ.
This is a heavy piece and a Caucasian wrote it.
THEY ARE STILL OUR SLAVES
We can continue to reap profits from the Blacks without the effort
of physical slavery. Look at the current methods of containment that
they use on themselves: IGNORANCE, GREED, and SELFISHNESS. Their IGNORANCE is
the primary weapon of containment. A great man once said, "The best way to hide
something from Black people is to put it in a book." We now live in the Information
Age. They have gained the opportunity to read any book on any subject through
the efforts of their fight for freedom, yet they refuse to read.
There are numerous books readily available at Borders, Barnes
&Noble, and Amazon.com, not to mention their own Black Bookstores that provide
solid blueprints to reach economic equality (which should have been their
fight all along), but few read consistently, if at all. GREED is another
powerful weapon of containment.
Blacks, since the abolition of slavery, have had large amounts of
money at their disposal. Last year they spent 10 billion dollars during
Christmas, out of their 450 billion dollars in total yearly income (2.22%). Any of us
can use them as our target market, for any business venture we care to dream
up, no matter how outlandish, they will buy into it.
Being primarily a consumer!people, they function totally by greed.
They continually want more, with little thought for saving or
investing.They would rather buy some new sneaker than invest in starting a business. Some
even neglect their children to have the latest Tommy or FUBU, And they still
think that having a Mercedes, and a big house givesthem "Status" or that they
have achieved the American Dream. They are fools!
The vast majority of their people are still in poverty because their
greed holds them back from collectively making better communities. With
the help of BET, and the rest of their black media that often broadcasts
destructive images into their own homes, we will continue to see huge profits like
those of Tommy and Nike. (Tommy Hilfiger has even jeered them, saying he
doesn't want their money, and look at how the fools spend more with him
than ever before!). They'll continue to show off to each other while we
build solid communities with! the profits from our businesses that we market to them.
SELFISHNESS, ingrained in their minds through slavery, is one of the
major ways we can continue to contain them. One of their own, Dubois said
that there was an innate division in their culture. A "Talented Tenth" he
called it. He was correct in his deduction that there are segments of their
culture that has achieved some "form" of success. However, that segment missed the
fullness of his work. They didn't read that the "Talented Tenth" was then
responsible to aid The Non-Talented Ninety Percent in achieving a better life.
Instead, that segment has created another class, a Buppie class that
looks down on their people or aids them in a condescending manner. They
will never achieve what we have. Their selfishness does not allow them to be
able to work together on any project or endeavor of substance. When they do get
together, their selfishness lets their egos get in the way of their
goal. Their so-called help organizations seem to only want to promote
their name without making any real change in their community. They are
content to sit in conferences and conventions in our hotels, and talk about what they will do, while they award plaques
to the best speakers, not the best doers. Is there no end to their selfishness?
They steadfastly refuse to see that TOGETHER EACH ACHIEVES MORE
(TEAM)! They do not understand that they are no better than each other of what
they own in fact, most of those Buppies are but one or two paychecks away from
poverty. All of which is under the control of our pens in our offices and our
rooms. Yes, we will continue to contain them as long as they refuse to read,
continue to buy anything they want, and keep thinking they are "helping" their
communities by paying dues to organizations which do little other than hold
lavish conventions in our hotels. By the way, don't worry about any of them
reading this letter, remember, 'THEY DON'T READ!!!! (Prove them wrong. Please pass this on! After Reading it..)
But there are some bad ones: African-Americans are entitled to a $5,000 slavery reparation
tax credit. Of
course, I'll take just about any excuse for a tax credit. I read in the
Washington Post a while ago that some black people were getting
prosecuted for attempting to claim that tax credit. But then, that could
be an Urban Legend, considering the source...
Interviewer - Ms. Williams we are all interested in your new
boyfriend.
Serena : There is no new boyfriend. I stopped playing with boys when
I stopped dating black guys. I have a new man in my life and yes, he's
white.
Interviewer - So you prefer to date white men instead of black guys?
Serena : let's be real. If you are a successful black female you
only have two choices....date outside of your race or date other
successful black females.
Interviewer - Are you saying there are no successful black men to
date?
Serena : Of course not but lets face it, if Oprah would date outside
of her race she would be married with children now. The state of most
black men is so low the only thing you can do is love them. Like a poor
homeless dog. You can't expect it to protect you. You can only offer
shelter and love and watch as our neighbor's pitbull protects his home
and family. I, unlike Oprah, am not forced to stay within those
boundaries. I was born into a new generation of black women.
Interviewer - And you think the best man is a non-black man?
Serena : I think if there's a better choice for me, God would have
shown me. I am in the public so I get to meet lots of people from all
over the world athletes, celebs etc.I am wealthy so I am invited and
have traveled to the most prestigious events all over the world. Out of
all those people, places and events....I had to choose the right man for
me. Like it or not with very few exceptions) a white man is the only
real choice for a successful black female.
As the Urban Legends site says, Williams herself has responded:
Words cannot express how upset I am to find out that someone has
deliberately attempted to ruin my reputation and image.
I would never, ever, under any circumstance, be so disrespectful.
Whoever decided to write this garbage does not know Serena Williams. It
is not my thinking nor my being. I want to find out who is behind this,
and have them prosecuted within the fullest extend of the law. I am
hoping that there will be more policing over the Internet, in order to
find out immediately the origin of this kind of treachery. No one
deserves to be humiliated and defamed this way.
